Plateforme Haïtienne de Plaidoyer pour un Développement Alternatif


Home - Intégration Alternative - OMC

EU to Still Provide 55 Billion Euros in Export Supports Even if Export Subsidies are Cut


Posté le 20 décembre 2005 par Administrateur

The US and EU have deceived the developing world in this Ministerial. Whilst loud on rhetoric about "Development", this has descended into a Doha Deception Round.

Cuts to Export Subsidies Amounts to No Change On export subsidies, the EC is extracting a high price, in return for doing nothing. A large proportion of EU supports go into subsidizing exports. However, only a small part is classified as export subsidies.

Most fall into the WTO-legal "Green Box" which has escaped disciplines in the current negotiations. 55 billion Euros provided by the EU annually are trade distorting.

This will remain even if export subsidies are phased out. Today, export subsidies only make up 3 billion Euros. There are still 47 billion trade distorting supports which are falsely classified as WTO legal in the Green Box. By 2013, export subsidies would have been reduced to 1 billion Euros as a result of the 2003 reform of the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP), whilst 49 billion would still be provided under the WTO Green Box.

There is no reduction in the overall cuts in domestic supports. Nor is there reduction of cuts in trade distorting supports. Export subsidies are being phased out, but hidden export subsidies housed in the Green Box, and will replace export subsidies.

Locking in US, EU Subsidies

There are no cuts in domestic supports. In fact, the text, stating that there is "some convergence" on cuts in domestic supports completely lets the US and EU off the hook. It implies acceptance of US and EU offers (in October), which did not cut into their real supports, but legitimized the supports they give to their farmers. There will not be an end to dumping in rice, beef, diary, maize, soya or cotton.

Says Aileen Kwa of Focus on the Global South, "This has been a deceitful exercise. US and EU have lied their way through these negotiations, whilst crafting the rules that reinforce their system of subsidization that is depressing world prices and displacing small farmers in the South". EU has offered to cut trade distorting domestic supports by 70% and the US by 60%. However, these supports only cut into money they do not currently provide. It does not cut into their present applied levels.

EU subsidies of 90 billion Euros will be retained, and US subsidies of US$74 billion will still be in place. This agreement will have grave implications for the cotton farmers.

Giving Nothing, Grabbing Developing Country Markets in Services This is a completely hollow agriculture package. Yet the developing world have been asked to swallow the bitter pill of opening up aggressively in services. The US and EU want aggressive sectoral negotiations to take place after Hong Kong in finance, telecommunications, distribution, education, postal services, computer and business services etc. They want the developing countries to accept a set of rules in each of these sectors that will allow foreign investors the same rights as local suppliers, and the complete opening of domestic services markets.

Sectoral negotiations will be the big win - in distribution, Walmart and Carrfour will have markets opened to them. In computer and business services, IBM, in postal /express delivery, DHL and IPS, in finance, the winners are the major banks of the US and EU, in energy, Haliburton.

A sectoral negotiation in distribution, for instance, means that countries will be coerced or strongly pressured into allowing the entry of hypermarkets and removing any existing regulation that limits such entry. The losers are the poor in developing countries that sell their produce on the road sides, local markets or small retail shops. Their livelihoods will be at stake.

Implications for Developing Countries

According to Kwa, "For the African and Caribbean countries, even for most in Latin America, increased unemployment and poverty will result from this Ministerial, in agriculture, industry and in the services sectors."

Contact :

Focus on the Global South

Brett Solomon - 852 649 72675

Aileen Kwa - 852 61293671


Un coup d’œil sur le tarif douanier de nos voisins

Posté le 1er juillet 2013 par PAPDA

La lucha por el control de la OMC

Posté le 13 mai 2013 par PAPDA

La derrota al candidato neoliberal en la OMC, ¿es la victoria de la alternativa popular, o qué es ?

Posté le 10 mai 2013 par PAPDA

Les citoyens contre l’OMC

Posté le 20 avril 2007 par PAPDA

Négociations à l’OMC

Posté le 24 mars 2006 par PAPDA

La signification profonde des négociations de l’OMC à Hong Kong en Décembre 2005

Posté le 19 janvier 2006 par PAPDA

The Meaning of Hong Kong : Brazil and India Join the Big Boys’ Club

Posté le 23 décembre 2005 par PAPDA

Korean Struggle Mission - Report of Activities

Posté le 23 décembre 2005 par PAPDA


Posté le 20 décembre 2005 par PAPDA


Posté le 20 décembre 2005 par PAPDA


Quelle planification pour les 1.3 millions de déplacés ?

Posté le 7 décembre 2010

Déclaration de la Campagne "KABA GRANGOU" sur la conjoncture

Posté le 23 novembre 2010

Nòt pou lapres Kaba Grangou

Posté le 23 novembre 2010

Rejection of MINUSTAH

Posté le 28 octobre 2010

Comment Monsanto s’infiltre dans les pays du Sud (Source :Terra-eco)

Posté le 28 octobre 2010

Deklarasyon TK, Chandèl, MODEP

Posté le 18 mars 2008

Haïti, les Élections et la Démocratie

Posté le 8 octobre 2007

Haiti : Why is it necessary to relieve Haiti of its debt burden ?

Posté le 13 avril 2006

Haïti et la crise de la dette externe envers la France

Posté le 13 avril 2006

Pour une annulation IMMEDIATE de la dette envers la Banque Interaméricaine de Développement !

Posté le 8 mars 2006


Tous droits réservés © PAPDA 2005

URL ancien site (archives):

Site réalisé par la PAPDA

Utilisation de SPIP, logiciel libre distribué sous license GPL

Hébergement chez Alternatives Canada

Enhance your browsing experience: Get Firefox